Improving the Journey Page Builder UI

Reducing friction and cognitive load during page creation.

The Journey Page Builder allows users to create personalized proposal pages.

While users can complete tasks when guided, the existing interface creates unnecessary friction due to a cluttered layout, unclear steps, and multiple system dependencies.

The Journey Page Builder allows users to create personalized proposal pages. While users can complete tasks when guided, the existing interface creates unnecessary friction due to a cluttered layout, unclear steps, and multiple system dependencies.

The Journey Page Builder allows users to create personalized proposal pages. While users can complete tasks when guided, the existing interface creates unnecessary friction due to a cluttered layout, unclear steps, and multiple system dependencies.

Problem Statement

The Journey Page struggled to clearly guide users toward meaningful actions.

Critical content competed for attention, primary CTAs were easy to miss, and users lacked a sense of progression or purpose when landing on the page.

While direct quantitative analytics were limited, multiple qualitative signals pointed to usability breakdowns:


  • Repeated navigation loops

  • Internal feedback highlighting confusion around next steps

  • Heuristic evaluation revealing weak hierarchy and content overload


These issues suggested the page was increasing cognitive load instead of supporting confident decision-making.

Role & Responsibilities

Product Designer / UX Designer

Timeline: 1 month

Users: Salesperson, business owners

I led the UX and UI design work, including problem definition, usability review, layout refinement, and final design delivery. I worked closely with stakeholders to ensure the solution aligned with product constraints and the existing design system.

Research & Insights

Research Methods

  • Heuristic evaluation

  • Competitor and pattern benchmarking

  • Review of internal feedback and observed user behavior

Key Insights & Design Decisions

Insight

Design Decision

Users usually skim content

Users usually skim content

Reduced text density for instructions

Reduced text density for instructions

Users lacked a sense of progression

Users lacked a sense of progression

Introduced clearer grouping & visual hierarchy

Introduced clearer grouping & visual hierarchy

Similar content competed for attention

Similar content competed for attention

Standardized card layouts to improve scanability

Standardized card layouts to improve scanability

Research Summary

Based on usability review and qualitative feedback:

Complex Steps - multiple paragraph of instructions visually dominate the screen causing cognitive overload & prevent users from scanning or skimming effectively.


Broken workflow dependencies - Key actions (such as adding logos or videos) require leaving the Page Builder to access the Library. This causes mistakes and disrupt user flow.


These findings highlighted the need for stronger hierarchy and clearer structure

Goals

  • Clarify the user journey and next steps

  • Reduce cognitive load during exploration

  • Improve content scanability and hierarchy

  • Enable easier iteration for future enhancements

Design Approach

Simplifying the Layout

The redesign focused on restructuring information rather than adding new UI patterns. Content was grouped more intentionally, spacing was adjusted to create breathing room, and visual hierarchy was strengthened to guide attention naturally.


Primary actions were more prominent, while secondary information was deprioritized to reduce noise.

Clarifying Visual Hierarchy

Typography, spacing, and component consistency were refined to ensure users could quickly scan and understand:


  • What the page is about

  • What actions are available

  • What content deserves attention first


This approach favored clarity and predictability over novelty.

Reduce workflow dependencies

  • Let users upload logos or videos, without jumping back to the Library

  • Allow adding logos directly from the Journey Page

Constraints & Trade-offs

Due to time and resource constraints, the solution prioritized layout refinement and component revamp within the existing design system, thus success metrics can’t be evaluated.


This allowed the team to deliver meaningful improvements quickly while keeping the design scalable.

Success Metrics (Post-Launch)

If measured post-launch, success would be evaluated using:


  • Task completion rate

  • Time-to-first-action


These metrics would validate whether clarity improvements translated into behavioral gains.

Key Learnings

Clear hierarchy and structure often have more impact than adding new features.


Small layout and spacing adjustments can significantly influence user confidence and decision-making when applied intentionally.

With access to live analytics and direct user testing, I would validate assumptions through task-based usability tests and iterate on personalization strategies once baseline clarity is established.

Testimonials

All rights reserved © 2026

Romel Galorio

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.